34 C
Tuesday, February 25, 2020

How and why do governments shut down internet in Africa?

No Facebook, Twitter or WhatsApp.

That’s what’s becoming increasingly common in some African countries, where governments have periodically shut down the internet or blocked social media platforms. 

It’s a year since Chad blocked access to the most popular social media sites.

Sudan had limited access during anti-government protests, as did the authorities in Zimbabwe.

Digital rights activists say it’s censorship, but governments argue it helps maintain security. 

So how do governments shut down or block the internet in practice?

Blocking access 

A government can limit access to the internet by ordering internet service providers (ISPs) to limit access to their subscribers. 

In the first instance, this is likely to be a block on commonly used social media sites.

As a more extreme measure, the authorities can order service providers to block all internet access.

In 2018, there were 21 instances of partial or total internet shutdowns, compared with 13 in 2017 and 4 in 2016, according to Access Now, an independent monitoring group.

Ivory Coast, DR Congo, Chad, Cameroon, Sudan, Ethiopia, Mali, Nigeria and Sierra Leone restricted access to the internet last year. ADVERTISEMENT

It’s also a global trend. In 2018, there were 188 shutdowns, compared to 108 in 2017 and 75 in 2016.

Internet shutdowns in Africa

This includes complete outages, social media shutdowns and throttling.Source: Access Now

In each country, it’s down to the individual service providers to carry out these instructions from the authorities to block access.

One method used is known as URL-based blocking. 

This is a filter which prevents access to a list of banned sites. 

A user trying to access these sites might see various messages such as “server not found” or “this site has been blocked by the network administrator”.

Another method is called throttling.

This approach severely limits traffic to specific sites, giving the impression that the service is slow, thereby discouraging access.

This is more subtle, as it’s difficult to know whether sites are being actively restricted or whether poor infrastructure is to blame. 

As a final measure, telecoms companies can be required to shut down their services entirely, preventing all data access.

Can service providers say no?

The ability of governments to censor the internet depends on their ability to exercise control over telecommunications companies. 

Internet service providers are licensed by governments, which means they risk fines or the loss of their contracts.

Operators may have the right to appeal to the courts, but in practice they rarely do. 

However, there have been exceptions. 

Earlier this year the courts in Zimbabwe ruled in favour of reinstating internet access after the government ordered restrictions.

In response, the government of Zimbabwe has implemented new regulations allowing them greater control over the internet.

Zimbabwe’s information minister Monica Mutsvangwa says this will “ensure that internet and related technologies are used for the good of society, not to violate national security.” 

But there are also examples where governments wishing to shut down the net have an easier task.

“There are exceptions like Ethiopia where telecommunications is still not liberalised”, says Dawit Bekele, Africa Regional Bureau Director for the Internet Society.

“There is a de-facto single gateway owned by the government operator that can easily be used to block the Internet,” he says. 

Unless access to the internet has been shut down completely, there are ways that individuals can manage to evade these barriers. 

The most common method is the use of virtual private networks (VPNs).

These VPNs encrypt data paths, making it difficult for service providers to block access to restricted sites.

Governments can also block VPNs, but are less inclined to do so because this also severely inconveniences foreign diplomats and large companies which use them. 

Some African governments have pointed to the rise of “fake news” online as a reason for enforcing restrictions. 

But some analysts and opposition figures consider this an excuse for suppressing groups critical of the government, which often organise on Facebook and WhatsApp.

“Before, during and after elections, governments tend to block the internet because of dissent,” says Mr Bekele.


Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Latest News

Guinea-Bissau to recount votes just days before inauguration

Guinea-Bissau’s National Electoral Commission is to recount the votes from the second round of the presidential election that took place on 29 December.The commission...

Malawi parliament sets new date for fresh elections after annulment

Malawi parliament passed a law that sets 19 May 2020 as the date for fresh presidential elections, this follows the order of the court...

Erdogan says 2 Turkish troops killed in Libya

President Tayyip Erdogan said on Tuesday two Turkish troops were killed in Libya where they back the internationally-recognized government in the north African state’s...

Tanzanian journalist freed after pleading guilty to economic crimes

Tanzanian journalist Erick Kabendera, who was held in jail for seven months in a case that prompted international concern, was freed on Tuesday after...

Libyan lawmakers allied to Haftar wont join Geneva talks

Lawmakers based in areas of eastern Libya controlled by military commander Khalifa Haftar said on Monday they would not participate for now in peace...

Court issues arrest warrant for Julius Malema for no appearance

A warrant of arrest has been issued for EFF leader Julius Malema for not appearing in court on five charges related to him allegedly...

Concern on coronavirus spreading in China and beyond

Fears grew on Monday that the coronavirus outbreak in China will grow into a pandemic with disruptive and deadly consequences for countries around the...

Libya government says Haftar’s forces must withdraw troops near Tripoli

Libya’s foreign affairs minister said on Monday that the internationally recognized government is insisting that the troops of eastern commander Khalifa Haftar withdraw from...

Lesotho PM in court to hear charges of murdering wife

Lesotho’s Prime Minister Thomas Thabane appeared in court on Monday, sitting by side with 1st Lady also accused to hear charges of murdering his...

Egypt executes convicted militant Hisham Ashmawy

Egypt on Monday executed Hisham al-Ashmawy, described as the country’s most dangerous Islamist militant, after he was convicted by a military court of orchestrating...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -
%d bloggers like this: